Back to Questions
Want to know:
Legal Concepts63) Leona drove into an eatery and ordered Volcano Chicken. Harry, who took her order, was anew employee who had started working in the eatery the same day. When asked if the chickenshe ordered was very spicy, Leona was informed by Harry—who was not aware of all details ofthe eatery yet—that it was not. However, when Leona took a bite, she found the hot sauceextremely spicy which resulted in her choking on the piece of chicken and requiring medicalhelp. Which of the following statements is true in this context?A) Harry can be sued for fraud in inducement.B) Harry's employment can be terminated for having committed fraud in inception.C) Harry can be sued for innocent misrepresentation.D) Harry cannot be sued for innocent misrepresentation.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- no project shall be implemented with out an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)
- When a plaintiff has both federal and state-based claims against a defendant and diversity jurisdiction does not exist, the federal court has:A Discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim if the two claims derive from a common nucleus of operative fact and are such that a plaintiff would ordinarily be expected to try them all in one judicial proceedingB Discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim, regardless of whether the two claims derive from a common nucleus of operative factC No discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim; it must transfer all claims to state courtD No discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim; it must do so
- Jason (South Carolina) was alternating between playing Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis while flying his rocket pack. He got into an accident with Euripides (North Carolina), who was out hang gliding. When they collided, the Sega Genesis began leaking out acid which burned through the hang glider, causing Euripides to have to bail out. As soon as he landed, he contacted his lawyer and sued Jason for negligence and asserted $100,000 in damages. Jason impleaded McCollum Electronic Repairs, Inc., which has its principal place of business, and is incorporated in, South Carolina, under Rule 14 for dumping acid into the console while repairing it and sought $50,000. McCollum Electronic Repairs filed a motion to dismiss Jason's impleader claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Under Kroger, what result?A.Granted because hearing the claim violates Article III §2.B.Denied because hearing the claim does not violate Article III §2.C.Granted because hearing the claim violates 28 U.S.C. §1332.D.Denied.