When a plaintiff has both federal and state-based claims against a defendant and diversity jurisdiction does not exist, the federal court has:A Discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim if the two claims derive from a common nucleus of operative fact and are such that a plaintiff would ordinarily be expected to try them all in one judicial proceedingB Discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim, regardless of whether the two claims derive from a common nucleus of operative factC No discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim; it must transfer all claims to state courtD No discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim; it must do so

Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!