Want to know:
A city passes an ordinance confiscating all firearms. Officials come to Rambo's house to confiscate $70,000 in rifles, pistols, rocket launchers, cannons, and gatling guns. Rambo sues the city in federal court for $70,000, asserting that the city violated the second amendment to the federal constitution. Does the court have federal question jurisdiction?A.No because the amount-in-controversy is not met.B.No unless a federal defense is raised.C.Yes because the plaintiff is the master of her complaint.D.Yes because the plaintiff's complaint is based on federal law.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- What is the suit a public entity initiates to aquire property using eminent domain?
- Bastilla (North Carolina) gets into an accident with Revan (Florida) while on vacation in Costa Rica. Bastilla really wants to sue in North Carolina state court. In the meantime, she hires a private investigator named Carth to dig up dirt. Carth's research reveals that Revan had family drama and will be driving through North Carolina to his older brother Malak's house in Virginia to talk about their late father's will. It will be the first time Revan has ever set foot in North Carolina; he has no family or property there. Carth follows behind Revan's car and calls Bastilla when Revan stops for gas near Bastilla's house. Bastilla's process server drives to the gas station and serves Revan the complaint. Does an N.C. court have personal jurisdiction?A.TrueB.False
- Notify the Board of any criminal conviction, judgement of a malpractice case?