Back to Questions
Want to know:
When using the justification that "the tactic was unavoidable," the negotiator is saying that A. the negotiator was not in full control of his or her actions and hence should not be held responsible.B. what the negotiator did was really trivial and not very significant.C. the tactic helped to avoid greater harm.D. the quality of the tactic should be judged by its consequences.E. The justification that "the tactic was unavoidable" implies all of the above.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- What did the Federalist #51 do?A) dove into the system of "Checks and Balances" within the new GovernmentB) a well-reasoned argument as to why the constitution was uniquely capable of preventing the United States' domination by factions and Special interest groups.C) a defense of the republican form of government, first describing what qualified as a republic, then pronouncing the constitution as a federal rather than national form of governmentD) provided a defense for the method of electing the president of the United States: the Electoral College
- What warning does Caesar hear three times in Scene 2 of Act 1?
- comment est l'orientation du colon gauche?