Back to Questions
Want to know:
What should the pharmacy technician do if he or she get a prescription for cortisporin otic solution with directions to instill 1 drop in the left eye two times daily (bid) for 5 days?
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Oda Nobunaga (California) and Toyotomi Hideyoshi (Oregon) got into a car accident while both were on their way to visit a museum exhibit about the Japanese civil wars in the 16th century. Nobunaga sued in Oregon federal court for $100,000. He served process by having a process server leave the complaint and summons at Hideyoshi's house with his wife. However, Oregon's rules permit only personal service by a non-party. As a result, Hideyoshi files a motion to dismiss for insufficient process, arguing that the federal court should apply Oregon's service rules.Working with a neighbor, decide how the court will rule here. If you think Erie does not clearly answer the question of what to do, formulate a test for how courts can decide what to do in circumstances like this.
- An ecologist, a citizen of State A, sued a cab driver, a citizen of State B, in the federal district court in State C. The ecologist is seeking $77,000 in damages for tortious injuries caused by the cab driver's allegedly negligent driving while the ecologist and cab driver were in State D. The cab driver was served with process while on vacation in State C, in accordance with State C law.What is cab driver's strongest argument against litigating the case in State C?A court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the cause of action.B court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have personal jurisdiction over the cab driver.C court should transfer the lawsuit to a State D state court because it is inconvenient for the cab driver to litigate in State C.D court should dismiss the lawsuit because State C is not a proper venue to litigate the cause of action.
- moral pressure/threats of future harm constitute false imprisonment?