Want to know:
Larry Lawstudent borrows $500 from Metropolitan Bank, under the North Carolina Stafford Act, which is modeled on, and copies from, the Federal Stafford Act. Under the program, banks make loans to students under individual loan agreements with each student. The statute setting up the program includes a guarantee that, if the student defaults, and the bank cannot collect after diligent efforts, the state will use a grant from the federal government to assure payment of the outstanding balance. Larry defaults on his loan, and Metropolitan sues him for the amount due in North Carolina state court. Larry removes to federal court, asserting that there is federal question jurisdiction. Is there?A.Yes because there is a federal issue in the lawsuit.B.No unless Larry can argue that a federal statute excuses him from paying because of financial hardship.C.No because the bank's complaint is based on state law.D.Yes because the North Carolina Stafford Act is based on federal law.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Select the statement that best describes the relationship between removal and venue:A: In a properly removed case, venue is proper in the federal court of the state where the case was pending, even if venue would have been improper had the plaintiff originally filed the action in the federal district court of that stateB: In a properly removed case, venue is proper in the federal court of the state where the case was pending, but only if venue would have been proper had the plaintiff originally filed the action in the federal district court of that stateC: Venue and removal have no correlation
- Rebellion, Inc. distributes property worth $20,000 (adjusted basis = $5,000) to its shareholder, Jerry. Rebellion's current E&P was $100,000 at the time of distribution. What is Jerry's basis in the property received?
- Which of the following routes of administration have 100% bioavailability?