In the world of science and business, we rarely have the luxury of absolute certainty. Instead, we rely on statistical hypothesis testing to make informed decisions based on sample data. Whether we are testing if a new drug is effective, if a marketing campaign increased sales, or if a car's gas mileage meets its advertised claims, we are essentially conducting an experiment to see if our data supports a specific theory.
However, because we are using samples to make inferences about entire populations, there is always a risk of drawing the wrong conclusion. These mistakes are formally known as statistical errors.
The Foundation: Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Before understanding errors, we must define the two competing claims at the heart of every test:
- Null Hypothesis (): This is the tentative assumption or the "status quo" that you begin with. It is often the opposite of what a researcher is trying to prove. For example, if you are testing if a new energy drink actually works, the null hypothesis might state that the drink provides no extra energy ( hours).
- Alternative Hypothesis ( or ): This is the counter-claim that the researcher is testing and hopes to support. In the energy drink example, the alternative would be that the drink provides less than the claimed energy ( hours).
These two hypotheses are always opposites. If the data provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, we accept the alternative. If we fail to reject the null, we do not necessarily "prove" it is true, but we conclude there isn't enough evidence to support the alternative.
Keep reading for free.
Create an account to finish this reading and make it part of your study routine.
Continue reading freeAlready have an account? Log in
Updated