Back to Questions
Want to know:
Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?No single branch of government would have too much power.The president should have more power than the other branches.Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Which of the following is an example of a Regulatory Commission?
- A cashier at the Second Bank of the United States, James W. McCulloch, refused to pay the legislation tax imposed on the bank by the state of Maryland.In deciding this case about a national bank and state taxes, the court established supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws. Maryland couldn’t impose tax on the bank because the Constitution did not specify that the federal government could charter a bank.
- Which of the following best describes the primary formal role of the attorney general? A. Providing legal advice for the president and cabinet secretariesB. Serving as a liaison between the president and the supreme courtC. Serving as the chief executive officer of the department of justiceD. Directing the government accountability office (GAD)E. Persuading the senate to confirm the president's judicial nominees