Want to know:
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the separation of powers is integral to the Constitution not to preserve the prerogatives of each branch of government but to divide governmental powers among the branches so as to keep power diffused—and thereby limited and protective of personal freedom. . . .Thus, even if one branch of government consented to ceding an essential power to another branch, such a giveaway would be unconstitutional. . . .Can the president legally use military force to attack a foreign land without a serious threat or legal obligation or a declaration of war from Congress? In a word: No. Here is the back story. . . .. . . [A] bipartisan group of senators offered legislation supported by the president that . . . would permit a president to strike whomever and wherever he pleases. The president would be restrained only by a vote of Congress—after hostilities have commenced.Such a statute would give the president far more powers than he has now, would directly violate Congress' war-making powers by ceding them away to the president, would defy the Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of giving away core governmental functions, would commit the U.S. to foreign wars without congressional and thus popular support, and would invite dangerous mischief by any president wanting to attack any enemy—real or imagined, old or new—for foreign or domestic political purposes, whether American interests are at stake or not.Andrew Napolitano, "At War with the Separation of Powers," The Washington Times, 2018.Which of the following principles of government is most related to the author's argument in the passage?A. Separation of powers is necessary to our constitutional system to limit the power of the three branches and guarantee limited government.B. The president's power is constitutionally permitted to expand during times of crisis, which can lead to the use of force without permission from Congress.C. As the legislative branch, Congress is authorized to change the constitutional balance of power whenever it deems necessary.D. Separation of powers guarantees that each branch can focus on what it does best, but in some cases one branch may voluntarily cede power to another branch.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Before the Civil War, Dred Scott was a slave taken to a free state to live by his owner. Dred Scott believed he was free because he was in a state that banned slavery. He took his case to the Supreme Court and lost. The Supreme Court stated that slaves were WHAT and had no rights?
- A procedure to keep the Senate going during a filibuster in which the disputed bill is shelved temporarily so that the Senate can get on with other business.
- Which court officials take care of much of a judge's routine work, such as issuing court orders and hearing preliminary evidence in a case?A. MagistratesB. ClerksC. Court reportersD. Marshals